""

(855) 662-2723

Call Us for a Free Consultation

Facebook

Yelp

Google

Search

To all our current and prospective clients: In light of the National Emergency, our office will still be operational from either our office or remotely depending on the status of events. Either way, we still answer all of our calls directly 24/7. The best way to get a hold of us would be through our office number (951) 686-4818 or email (kia@kialaw.com). Our day-to-day operations depend on the safety of our staff and the courts being open for business. Feel free to reach out to us to inquire about your case or discuss any new cases with Mr. Feyzjou at the number above. Stay safe and we remain hopeful that this too shall pass with everyone’s health and safety in mind.

Rape Charges Dismissed Against Our Client, A Local Pastor on 11/21/14

CLICK HERE FOR DISMISSAL OF CHARGES

CLICK HERE TO SEE CBS STORY ON THE CASE

PRESS RELEASE – PERRIS: Rape charge against pastor dismissed – Press Enterprise

Our client was charged with extremely serious allegations of rape. We met with him and he explained he was falsely accused. After several months of defense investigation, we gathered significant evidence to substantiate the falsity of the allegations against him. We presented our case to the District Attorney.

On 11/21/2014, the charges against our client were dismissed in its entirety. We are in the process of preparing Press Releases to all the local print and online news organizations.

If you have any questions about a new or existing criminal case that you’re involved in, call our office at 951 686-4818 or email Mr. Kia Feyzjou at The Kia Feyzjou Law Firm at kia@kialaw.com

DUI Charges Dismissed on Sept 25, 2014 Case Settles For Reckless Driving

Kia Law Firm is pleased to report a recent result related to a drunk driving case that resolved on September 25, 2014. Our client, Mr. Ball, was charged with driving under the influence of drugs pertaining to an arrest in March 2014.

Our office was successful in dismissing the DUI related traffic stop and resolving the matter for a non-drunk driving related charge which meant our client’s drivers license was not affected. A “dry reckless” is essentially a non-DUI related conviction.

CLICK HERE FOR DISMISSAL OF DUI CHARGES BY ATTORNEY KIA FEYZJOU

September 2, 2014 Felony (Strike) Charges Dismissed, Prison Avoided. Settled For Misdemeanor. Client Is Released From Jail

Mr. Baranda was arrested for first degree residential burglary. He was arrested because the arresting officer believed he had sufficient probable cause to arrest Mr. Baranda. Mr. Baranda was brought to court and offered 2 years state prison with the assistance of the public defender. Mr. Baranda always proclaimed his innocence and told everyone that he did not burglarize anyone’s residence.

On July 31, 2014, I met with Mr. Baranda and we discussed this case. I told him that he had a strong defensible case and that we would set the matter for trial. The trial date was set for August 28, 2014. I appeared on August 28, 2014 with Mr. Baranda and we told the court that we were ready for trial. The court told us to come back on September 2, 2014 to start trial and picking a jury.

All of our witnesses and evidence was in order to start trial and prove that our client was NOT GUILTY of these charges. On September 2, 2014, the prosecutor re-evaluated their case against Mr. Baranda and offered him a misdemeanor Burglary charge to resolve this case and allowed him to be released. He was placed on Summary Probation. He does not have to report to any probation officer, is not a convicted felon and does not have a strike on his record.

Mr. Baranda was innocently jailed for 112 days. He did not want to go through the ordeal of a trial and agreed to accept a misdemeanor and be released and allowed to go home. While we thought that Mr. Baranda should have gone to trial, we respect his decision and still consider it a great outcome.

Attached below are the minutes from Mr. Baranda’s case. You can see when our office substituted in as the attorney of record, as well as the state prison offer and the final misdemeanor resolution.

Great lawyering comes from great preparation and experience. The lawyers at Kia Law Firm can assist with your case 24/7.

CLICK HERE FOR COURT RECORDS SHOWING DISMISSAL OF FELONIES

Not Guilty Jury Verdict On August 18th 2014 on Behalf of Our Client, A County Probation Officer

CLICK HERE FOR THE VERDICT

CLICK HERE FOR NEWSPAPER ARTICLE (PRESS ENTERPRISE) DESCRIBING NOT GUILTY VERDICT

Our client is Juan Avila. He is a San Bernardino County Probation Officer.  The Riverside District Attorney’s Office filed charges against Mr. Avila for one count of Battery in violation of 242 for an offense that occurred on May 17, 2013. Both our client and I felt that the charges against Mr. Avila were unsupported by the law and evidence.  Juan and I decided to challenge the state’s evidence and we were focused on proving to a jury of his peers that Mr. Avila was not guilty of those charges.

We started trial on August 7, 2014. On August 18, 2014, 12 jurors from Riverside County voted that Mr. Avila was not guilty of the charges. Mr. Avila can now return to his work and resume his duties as a San Bernardino County Correction Probation Officer.

A law firm is talented in high stakes criminal prosecution matters.  We are focused on justice. Justice was served on August 18, 2014.

If you  have any legal issues that you would want a second opinion on, please contact our law firm at (951) 686-4818.

Case RIM1310300 – Defendants

Seq Defendant Next Court Date Status Agency /
DR Number
Arrest Date Count 1 Charge Violation Date
1 AVILA, JUAN URIEL RSNO
G131370031
05/17/2013 PC M242 05/17/2013

Case RIM1310300 – AVILA, JUAN URIEL – Status

  Custody N/A
Filing Type Complaint Filing Date 07/09/2013
Ordered Bail $35,000.00 Posted Bail $0.00
D.A. Amberlie Romney Defense PVT-Kia Feyzjou
Next Action: Deputy Report #: RSNO G131370031
Warrant Type Status Issued Affidavit
  NONE  N/A  N/A 
Probation Type Granted Expiration
  N/A N/A N/A
Sentence Convicted Date Fine and Penalty Restitution Fine
  N/A   

Case RIM1310300 – AVILA, JUAN URIEL – Charges

Arrest Charges
Count Charge Severity Description Violation Date Plea Status
1 PC 243D M Force/Serious/Injury 05/17/2013
Filed Charges
Count Charge Severity Description Violation Date Plea Status
1 PC M242 M Battery 05/17/2013 ACQUITTED

All DUI Charges Dismissed on April 28, 2014

Client had a warrant for a 2008 DUI. Our office filed a motion to dismiss, commonly referred to as a Serna Motion. On April 28, 2014, we had a hearing in the Orange County Superior Court – Santa Ana Branch. After reviewing our evidence and listening to our argument, the court agreed to dismiss all of the charges against the Defendant. Click this link for a copy of the court dismissal record.

Client is Facing 9 Years In Prison, With a Prior Strike And 2 Felonies Settles For A Misdemeanor And Is Released From Jail

CLICK HERE TO SEE THE CASE REPORT

This is the story of Mr. Larios. He was arrested and charged with operating a “Chop Shop”, essentially dealing with stolen cars and selling their parts. Mr. Larios was offered 4 years in Prison when he was represented by the Deputy Public Defender. He was in custody for six months before he decided to hire our office.

Mr. Larios had a prior strike from 2008 and the prosecutor initially wanted State Prison when Mr. Larios attempted to settle the case initially. After we substituted in, we presented all of the weaknesses of the prosecution’s case to the handling attorney on behalf of the San Bernardino District Attorney’s Office.

On April 9, 2014, after careful consideration, the prosecution agreed to dismiss the two felony charges and the strike prior against Mr. Larios in exchange for him pleading to a Misdemeanor. Mr. Larios was released the same day to his family.

So, how did we get the prosecution offer to reduce considerably? Quite simple: We evaluated the case, the facts, the witnesses and evidence and determined that the prosecution could not prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Larios had engaged in unlawful criminal misconduct. At first, the prosecution was not in agreement with our analysis, however, they returned within 30 minutes and agreed to a reduction of the charges.

Had Mr. Larios taken the prosecution deal that was initially presented to him, he would have been serving 80% of 48 months.