To all our current and prospective clients: In light of the National Emergency, our office will still be operational from either our office or remotely depending on the status of events. Either way, we still answer all of our calls directly 24/7. The best way to get a hold of us would be through our office number (951) 686-4818 or email ( Our day-to-day operations depend on the safety of our staff and the courts being open for business. Feel free to reach out to us to inquire about your case or discuss any new cases with Mr. Feyzjou at the number above. Stay safe and we remain hopeful that this too shall pass with everyone’s health and safety in mind.

Client Falsely Accused of Sexual Allegations Facing Life in Prison. Charges Reduced to a Misdemeanor with Community Service and No Jail. No Requirement to Register as a Sex Offender.

Click Here To View Court Records Showing Our Client’s Life Charge Dismissed

Our client was charged with very serious allegations of child sexual abuse, which, if convicted, he would serve a life sentence in prison. When we first received the case in May 2011, we knew our client was innocent. Our client’s bail was originally set at $1,000,000. We fought against the charges vigorously and in August 2011, finally shed some light on the prosecutor that the life charges against our client was not appropriate.

In August 2011, after four months in jail, the District Attorney finally agreed to Dismiss Count 1 which was a charge of engaging in oral copulation with a child under 10. After extensive investigation, we were able to provide evidence that our client had not engaged in this type of behavior, or any sexual behavior whatsoever. Accordingly, the life charges were dismissed and our client’s bail was then reduced to $50,000.00 and he was released on bail.

While our client was out on bail, we continued to aggressively defend this case by showing our client was innocent. In doing so, we knew that we had to set this matter for trial and let a jury of our client’s peers determine his guilt or innocence. Even though the life charges were dismissed, the District Attorney continued to allege that our client was a child sexual predator and proceeded against him based on allegations that he engaged in lewd conduct with a child.

We set the matter for trial and our client was scheduled to start on August 27, 2012. Just before we started trial, the District Attorney finally agreed to resolve this case for a Misdemeanor charge of False Imprisonment with the balance of his time to be done on Community Service. Client was not required to register as a sex offender Pursuant to Penal Code 290. Client will not be deported or face the ridicule and embarrassment of falsely being a convicted child molestor.

If you have a child sexual abuse case that you need a second opinion, please contact our office at (951) 686-4818.

Aggressive Lawyering Results in Dismissal of Case on the Eve of Trial

My client was charged with an act of violence which was purely defensible. I had met with my client several months ago and he explained what had transpired. Law enforcement was called to the scene and based on incorrect information from eyewitnesses who didn’t have a proper vantage point, our client was arrested. Nevertheless, we met with our client, learned his side of the story and appeared in court on his behalf. We did not waive any time for trial and demanded a jury trial. On Friday, June 1, 2012, 2 days before trial, we announced ready for trial. Finally, the District Attorney reviewed their file and realized we were right. Case dismissed.


Felony Burglary and Perjury Charges Dismissed. Client Pleads to Misdemeanor and is Released.

Our client was charged with significant felonies and offered a state prison sentence. Our office substituted into the case and challenged the state’s evidence. We believed that although a crime had been committed, it did not rise to the level of felony conduct.

We challenged the state’s evidence and proceeded to preliminary hearing where we cross-examined the arresting officers.

Following the preliminary hearing in this matter, we were then offered the opportunity to plead to a misdemeanor charge and to have both felonies dismissed.

Our client was released from custody without being a convicted felon. He was able to remain in this country and keep his greencard. As you can see from page 3 of this case report, the felonies were dismissed.


Client Charged with Felony Grand Theft Charges Dismissed

Our client was charged with felony grand theft. She was initially offered a mandatory jail sentence. Client had initially utilized the services of the public defender’s office. Our office substituted into the case. After learning about the facts of the case, we came to the realization that our client’s constitutional rights were violated. We thereafter filed a SERNA MOTION which addresses these types of violations.

The District Attorney, after having reviewed our motion, agreed to “submit” on our moving papers, essentially indicating to the court that our position was rightful and that they had no opposition to the challenge we made to dismiss the charges.

The court agreed with our position and in May 2011 the Judge in the Fontana Superior Court dismissed the entire case against our client.

At KIA LAW FIRM, we fight for the rights of our clients. This is another example of how the police believed a crime had been committed, the District Attorney believed that they could prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt and brought charges, and, ultimately, how significant representation at an aggressive level results in a favorable outcome for our client.

Our client was able to avoid a felony conviction, prevent herself from losing her job and keep her record clean.

For a free consultation, please feel free to contact one of the attorneys at KIA LAW FIRM at the numbers above.

Defendant is Offered to Accept Life in Prison Before Trial. Offer Rejected. Mr. Feyzjou Wins at Trial. Case Dismissed.


The case above represents a prime example of how Mr. Feyzjou’s client was offered to accept a life sentence before trial. I strongly believed in the innocence of my client. We rejected the offer. We proceeded to trial. For many attorneys, this would have been a daunting task. Many attorneys who are fearful of going to trial often pressure their clients to accept deals, rather than test the state of the evidence.

Using litigation strategies, tactics and exceptional trial litigation skills, my client and I moved forward and trial commenced. I have attached the transcript referencing the life sentence offer my client was given prior to our starting trial.  I have also attached the court’s “docket” which reflects what happened at trial. Please note the second to last page of this PDF attachment. As you will note, the case was dismissed after the jury returned with a hung jury verdict.

What does this mean? This means that an individual who was facing life in prison is now a free man. The police officer believed my client was guilty, therefore, he was arrested. The Los Angeles District Attorney believed that my client was guilty beyond a reasonable a doubt, therefore, they filed a criminal complaint against him. However, my office, myself and my staff believed in the innocence of our client.

My exceptional trial skills allowed me to persuade the 12 impaneled jurors that this case was based on more of a personal vendetta against my client, as opposed to a true violation of any criminal statute.

To this day, my client keeps in contact with me, practically, on a weekly basis thanking me for the work we did on his behalf.

A good trial attorney will post not only his results, but proof to back it up. For all of our exceptional results, you will see minute orders and court records referencing our past record. When choosing an attorney to assist you on your criminal matter, don’t rely on anonymous statements that are unsupported. As you will note, we redact the names of our clients for confidentiality reasons, however, the records are nonetheless made public on

If you have any legal questions related to any criminal offense, please do not hesitate to contact our office.

Jury Trial Just Completed on a Drunk Driving Case. Case Dismissed After Jury Returns with a Hung Jury Verdict.

PEOPLE v. RODRIGUEZ, Dept. 70, Metropolitan Courthouse – Los Angeles

Copy of the Minute Order Reflecting The Verdict and Dismissal Will Be Updated Shortly


Mr. Feyzjou recently tried a case where the prosecution alleged a violation of Vehicle Code 23152(a) and 23152(b). The case went to jury trial. Mr. Feyzjou cross-examined the police officer and chemist.  The jury deliberated for a day and returned indicating that they could not come to a unanimous decision regarding guilty. The jury was deadlocked 10 votes for not guilty and 2 votes for guilt on the issue of impairment. Additionally, the jury was deadlocked 7 votes for not guilty and 5 votes for guilty on the issue of whether the client was driving on a blood alcohol concentration of .08 or more.

After the jury returned with their verdict, Mr. Feyzjou filed a motion to dismiss the entire case pursuant to Penal Code 1385. The judge granted this request on the theory that the Judge, as the 13th juror, could independently evaluate the the case and determine whether the matter should be refiled.

After hearing the evidence, the court determined there was insufficient evidence to warrant a re-trial and the case was dismissed.

Accessibility Tools